Information Credibility Evaluation

IORG: A Guide to Information Literacy

4 steps of information credibility evaluation

Identify factual statements and opinions contained in information
Verify correctness and completeness of the source and content of the provided facts
Consider reasonableness of opinion based on provided facts
Determine information credibility
Observe other characteristics (optional additional step)

Methodology

Full evaluation methodology available in IORG’s book “A Guide to Information Literacy”, chapter 4.

Eval

「10 萬印度移工讓台灣變成性侵島」可判定為資訊操弄

IORG 訊息可信度評量 – 時事練習題第 21 題

Published = 2023.11.24 17:00

「馬斯克：兩岸 100% 會統一」可判定為資訊操弄

IORG 訊息可信度評量 – 時事練習題第 20 題

Published = 2023.11.14 19:30

「死者遇難是因為他的政治立場」可判定為仇恨言論

IORG 訊息可信度評量 – 時事練習題第 19 題

Published = 2023.6.12 17:00

台中捷運傷亡事件 ETtoday、TVBS、少康戰情室、中時電子報使用「標題誘餌」可判定為可疑傳播行為

IORG 訊息可信度評量 – 時事練習題第 18 題

Published = 2023.5.11 22:00

「年輕人準備落跑」可判定為資訊操弄

IORG 訊息可信度評量 – 時事練習題第 17 題

Published = 2023.2.14 17:00

「台美豬肉製品瘦肉精超標」可判定為資訊操弄

IORG 訊息可信度評量 – 時事練習題第 16 題

Published = 2023.1.17 12:00

「蔡英文想讓年輕人當拆彈少年團」可判定為資訊操弄

IORG 訊息可信度評量 – 時事練習題第 15 題

Published = 2023.1.19 17:00

「美國干涉台積電赴美設廠及義務役期，蔡政府配合像兒皇帝」可判定為資訊操弄

IORG 訊息可信度評量 – 時事練習題第 13 題

Published = 2022.12.29 12:00